Pacific national university Main page Bulletin of Pacific national university

UDC 330.34; 332.142:339.147

© Loginova V. A., 2008

Modern Approaches to the Competitiveness Estimation for Territorial Economic Systems

The competitiveness estimation for territorial economic systems of various levels is necessary to choose a territory for business placing and labor force attraction. The competitiveness estimation problem, being now a debatable one, assumes some approaches to the solution: a choice of a uniform generalizing index, development of activities system on the basis of statistical data and activities systems using expert estimations.

References:

  1. Malecki E.J.  Knowledge and regional competitiveness. - Erdkunde, 2000, 54.
  2. Markusen A. Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts. - Economic Geography, 1996, 72.
  3. Gelvanovskiy M. I., ZHukovskaya V. M. O metodakh mezhstranovogo sopostavleniya pokazateley konkurentosposobnosti // Voprosy statistiki. 2000. ¹ 3.
  4. Ekspert. 1998. ¹ 39; 2000. ¹ 41; 2002. ¹ 45; 2003. ¹ 43; 2004. ¹ 45.
  5. Chernova T. V. Otsenka konkurentosposobnosti regionov RF [Elek-tronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa:  http://uecs.mcnip.ru
  6. Fatkhutdinov R. Problemy otsenki i povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti Rossii // STN. 2000. ¹ 7; Region na perekrestke Vostoka i Zapada: globalizatsiya i konkurentosposobnost / Pod red. N. YA. Kalyuzhnovoy, K. L. Lidina, A. YA. YAkobsona. M., 2003.; Vazhneyshie faktory povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti regionov [Elektronnyy re-surs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://2003.regionforum.ru//forum/materials; Pechatkin V. V., Salikhov S. U., Sablina V. A. Reytingovaya otsenka konkurentosposobnosti regionov [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://anrb.ru/isei/cf2004/d786.doc; Shekhovtseva L. S. Obosnovanie metodiki otsenki konkurentosposobnosti rossiyskikh regionov // Regionalnaya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika. 2007. ¹ 6. i drugie.
  7. Region na perekrestke Vostoka i Zapada: globalizatsiya i konkurentosposobnost. / Pod red. N. YA. Kalyuzhnovoy, K. L. Lidina, A. YA. YAkobsona. M., 2003.
  8. Vazhneyshie faktory povysheniya konkurentosposobnosti regionov [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://2003.regionforum.ru//forum/materials
  9. Pechatkin V. V., Salikhov S. U., Sablina V. A. Reytingovaya otsenka konkurentosposobnosti regionov [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://anrb.ru/isei/cf2004/d786.doc
  10. Chernova T. V. Otsenka konkurentosposobnosti regionov RF [Elek-tronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://uecs.mcnip.ru
  11. Metro Area and State Competitiveness Report. 2004. - Beacon Hill Institute at Suffolk University. [Elektronnyy resurs]. Rezhim dostupa: http://www.beaconhill.org
  12. Webster D., Muller L. Urban competitiveness assessment in developing country urban region: the road forward. Washington D.C., INFUD, 2000.
  13. Segal Gf., Moore A., Nolan J. California Competitive Cities: A Report Card on Efficiency in Service Delivery in Californias Largest Cities. Los Angeles,  Reason Foundation, 2002.
  14. Competitive European Cities: Where do the Core Cities Stand? - A report to the Office of the Deputy Prime Minister. London. January, 2004.
  15. The Global Competitiveness Report 2002 - 2003: World Economic Forum. Geneva, 2003.
  16. The World Competitiveness Yearbook (WCY) http://www02.imd.ch/wcy.

Download Download article (319.8 Kb)

Сontents Сontents